1st Edition

Co-Ordination in Context Institutional Choices to Promote Exports

By G.P.E. Walzenbach Copyright 1998
    309 Pages
    by Routledge

    310 Pages
    by Routledge

    First published in 1998. This book makes an original contribution to our understanding of policy failures at the European and international level. On the basis of a comparative analysis the study shows how the co-ordination mechanisms available in the European Community and OECD have complicated the regulation of national policies on state aid to exporting industries. This failure can be explained in theoretical terms: international and supranational organisations are not neutral arbiters, but have interests of their own, interests which are not necessarily aligned with those of their member states. In detailed case studies of Britain, France and Germany the book examines how the preference structure of governments in the exercise of their promotion programmes contrasts with the policies enacted by international bureaucracies. Walzenbach’s interdisciplinary approach specifies the conditions under which policy co-ordination can have detrimental effects and thus, usefully corrects the benign view held by most regime theorists about transaction-cost reducing and efficiency enhancing role of such arrangement.

    Part 1: Theoretical Foundations 1. Welfare and Institutional Design  2. Co-operation, Co-ordination and Integration  Part 2: Empirical Interest Structures 3. Britain: Export Promotion and Levelling the Playing Field  4. France: Export Promotion and Libéralisme Organis靠 5. Germany: Export Promotion and Ordnungspolitik  Part 3: European and International Institutions 6. Institutional Choice in the European Community  7. Institutional Choice in the OECD  Part 4: Conclusion 8. The Possibility of Reform
    ’All true believers in the beneficence of international and supranational organizations as well as their officials should read this challenging study. The story of OECD and EU efforts to coordinate national export-promoting policies suggests international bureaucracies may sometimes be the problem, not the solution.’ Susan Strange, University of Warwick, UK