I have a wonderful wife, five responsible children, and 20 very special grandchildren, and my greatest fear is that they (especially my grandchildren and possibly even my children and their spouses) will not have the same opportunities in coming years in this country as people my age (65) have enjoyed. We are watching the constitution and the free market system, which were established through inspiration by our Founding Fathers, being dismantled right before our eyes.
We are seeing irresponsibility rewarded while responsibility is punished. We are seeing multitudes of people, some of whom are in very important positions of power, claim that the Constitution is no longer a valid document – that it must be updated for the times. We are seeing countless demonstrations by people who have been blessed like no other people on the face of the earth, but who apparently have disdain for this country and all for which it stands.
I have very strong political views and I could go on and on regarding my concerns about the critical issues facing this country, but I realize that there are many great Americans who share my views and are in a better position than I am to sway opinion and affect public policy. However, I do have a business background that does, I believe, enable me to provide some benefit to the country, especially in these very perilous economic times.
In an attempt to establish my credentials, I will start by saying that I grew up in a sleepy little east Texas town, spending my summers in the watermelon and hay fields earning a buck an hour (Mr. Former President, there are NO jobs an American will not do for a fair wage - one that has not been artificially driven down due to illegal workers). I did well in school, especially in math and the sciences, and excelled in sports. Upon graduation I was offered football scholarships by several major universities. I ultimately decided to attend SMU in Dallas, since it was close to home, and, maybe more importantly, it had just started an Industrial Engineering program, which was of great interest to me.
Once on campus, I became overwhelmed and almost made the decision to go into business school instead. It seems that football players had not faired too well in the engineering school over the years (well, to be fair, my dad was quite persuasive in helping me make the decision to stay in engineering school). It turned out to be a good decision. I did quite well on the ball field, and I did very well in school. I ended up making the Dean’s list regularly and graduated with honors in 1970 with a BSIE.
After interviewing with a number of companies after graduation, I decided to cast my lot with Packard Electric, which was a division of General Motors, located in Warren, Ohio. I was quite impressed with their massive operation. It was a division of a very successful company (General Motors), it had a very strong Industrial Engineering Department, and it was located only about an hour’s drive from my parents’ new family home, following my father’s recent transfer to NE Ohio.
In my book, Intelligent Manufacturing, I will be sharing a great deal about Packard and GM, but for now let me state that Packard, in 1971, was a very strong manufacturing and engineering organization. I was fortunate to start in the Industrial Engineering Department as an Industrial Engineer and Preplanner, and then spend the next several years in manufacturing and engineering supervision.
Industrial Engineering was the center of the wheel at Packard, with spokes touching virtually all of the other functional areas within the company, i.e., Manufacturing, Application Engineering, Process Engineering, Plant Engineering, Quality Assurance, Quality Control, Material Control, Safety, Maintenance, Construction, , and even Finance and HRM. Packard’s Application (or Product) Engineers designed all of the wiring harnesses for all GM vehicles, and Industrial Engineering was responsible for designing, developing, installing, and debugging the manufacturing systems for each of these products, in coordination with all of the other functional areas.
And, the Manufacturing Department is where one witnesses the culmination of all efforts in any manufacturing operation, and it is without question the most important of all departments within a manufacturing company. A manufacturing company can get by with some weaknesses in various functional areas (assuming its product design technology is competitive), but if it has significant weaknesses in manufacturing, it will not be successful long term. I often related to others at Packard that I learned more about the wiring harness business and about relating to and managing (leading) people in the year and a half that I spent as a first-line manufacturing supervisor (Foreman) than I learned in any other 5 year period of my career.
After seven years in Warren, Ohio I was named as one of the members of the “Team of Ten” to be transferred to El Paso, Texas to start-up a new wiring harness plant in Juarez, Mexico in the spring of 1978. We were initially told the idea was to start one plant of about 1000 employees, train Mexican counterparts, and then return to Warren. That was about 26 plants, 50,000 Mexican employees, and several hundred U.S. employees ago.
For a period of 6 years, I had Industrial and Methods Engineering responsibility for three different plants as well as for the Mexican Supplier Program, to include developing and implementing training programs for Industrial and Methods Engineers, developing a implementing a training program for production operators, developing forward plans, designing and installing a Methods Lab, starting up new business, leading efforts to identify and resolve plant problems, and a host of other functions.
I was next given the opportunity to manage (lead) all engineering activities in our newly acquired facilities in Portugal, near Lisbon, which became part of Packard’s European Operations. After two and a half very exciting and productive years in Portugal, I was asked to be the Joint Representative Director for a new joint venture to be created in South Korea, located only about 25 miles south of the DMZ. This was a tremendous experience. We were able to start-up a new facility of 500 people, with very little outside support, in a manner which exceeded Packard’s expectations on timeliness, productivity, quality, and profitability.
After four years in Korea we returned to the states in 1990. Over the next decade I had a variety of interesting management assignments in Laredo, TX; Foley, Alabama; and then back in El Paso, TX. However, like our country, Packard had been changing dramatically over the prior three decades, and not for the better in most cases.
In 2001, after spending over 30 years with Packard, I finally grasped the reality that Packard was no longer the fine manufacturing company I had known in the early years; in fact, it was not even close, and likely would never be again since most of the people who had helped make it an outstanding manufacturer were no longer around. This was a bitter pill to swallow, knowing that Packard was at one time a shining star in what was to become the Delphi Automotive group.
During 2001, things began to look very bleak for Delphi Packard, as well as for the entire Delphi Automotive Corporation. In an effort to reduce burden, Delphi offered significant incentives to highly paid salaried employees who would volunteer for early retirements. Due to my lack of political correctness (political correctness being an important factor in getting ahead at Packard), I knew I was never going to reach the highest levels of the company, so my ability to impact dramatic change on this ailing company was limited. I decided to take the opportunity to get out while the getting was good. Since then, things have gone steadily downhill for Delphi, and they filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in October of 2005. Delphi Corporation finally emerged from Chapter 11 the second half of 2009, almost 4 years after entering bankruptcy, but unless Delphi dramatically changes in the way it does business (which is highly unlikely), I wouldn’t advise investing too heavily in this company.
After leaving Delphi Packard, I consulted for another large, automotive component, manufacturing company for several years before deciding to go into semi-retirement a few years back. The last few years have been a lot of fun, but I feel that there are things that I need to share, while they are still fresh in my mind, for the benefit of any company that will objectively consider what is being offered in my book, Intelligent Manufacturing.
My objective in writing this book is to help other companies learn from Packard’s and GM’s mistakes - not only the mistakes of commission, but also the mistakes of omission. It is very sad to me that some of the great concepts and systems that Packard had in place at one time were discarded, instead of being enhanced through renewed focus, and in some cases new technology. And, it is a shame that Packard lost the ability to differentiate between fluff and substance, even when it was offered to them on a silver platter. Hopefully, those of you who read Intelligent Manufacturing will be able to do just that.
In this book I also share several valuable concepts and tools that I developed during my working career of over three decades that I believe can help any conscientious company improve its competitive position and become a much stronger and more viable entity.