The Great Lakes Mississippi River Interbasin Study (GLMRIS) was commissioned by Congress to prevent the spread of aquatic nuisance species (ANS) from one basin to the other. I have served as the GLMRIS team's risk consultant and have guided them in the development of a comprehensive qualitative risk assessment of over 200 ANS.
Congress authorized the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to conduct
the Great Lakes Mississippi River Interbasin Study (GLMRIS) to
prevent the spread of aquatic nuisance species (ANS) from one basin
to the other. Here are a few fast facts about the risk
assessment:
- 254 ANS organisms identified
- 39 identified as organisms of potential concern
- 14 ANS are Medium or High risk in Focus Area 1 (CAWS)
- 5 pathways in Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS)
- 18 pathways in Focus Area 2 (non-CAWS).
The scope and magnitude of the problem produced a daunting
assessment challenge, especially when scientific data on these
species was often limited. Beginning with the simple risk
model:
Risk = Probability x Consequence
we decomposed the sequence of events necessary for the
establishment of an ANS as well as the categories of consequences
that could occur with establishment. This necessary chain of events
is summarized below:
Probability of spread to new waterways = P(path) x P(arrival) x
P(passage) x P(colonizes) X P(spreads)
Consequence of spread to new waterways = Economics +
Environmental + Political + Other
Each element of the probability and consequences was rated
a High, Medium, Low, or No risk potential based onthe best
available evidence. The uncertainty associated with each rating was
also rated and the element ratings were aggregated into an overall
risk potential. Risk control measures were identified
and their risk reduction potential was evaluated based on their
effectiveness in reducing one or more qualitiatve risk potential
ratings for the nine risk elements.