Search
Advanced Search
Textbooks Only
Loading...
Aquatic Nuisance Species Risk Assessment
on March 06, 2013
The Great Lakes Mississippi River Interbasin Study (GLMRIS) was commissioned by Congress to prevent the spread of aquatic nuisance species (ANS) from one basin to the other. I have served as the GLMRIS team's risk consultant and have guided them in the development of a comprehensive qualitative risk assessment of over 200 ANS.

Congress authorized the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to conduct the Great Lakes Mississippi River Interbasin Study (GLMRIS) to prevent the spread of aquatic nuisance species (ANS) from one basin to the other. Here are a few fast facts about the risk assessment:

  • 254 ANS organisms identified
  • 39 identified as organisms of potential concern
  • 14 ANS are Medium or High risk in Focus Area 1 (CAWS)
  • 5 pathways in Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS)
  • 18 pathways in Focus Area 2 (non-CAWS).

The scope and magnitude of the problem produced a daunting assessment challenge, especially when scientific data on these species was often limited. Beginning with the simple risk model:

Risk = Probability x Consequence

we decomposed the sequence of events necessary for the establishment of an ANS as well as the categories of consequences that could occur with establishment. This necessary chain of events is summarized below:

Probability of spread to new waterways = P(path) x P(arrival) x P(passage) x P(colonizes) X P(spreads)  

Consequence of spread to new waterways = Economics + Environmental + Political + Other
 
Each element of the probability and consequences was rated a High, Medium, Low, or No risk potential based onthe best available evidence. The uncertainty associated with each rating was also rated and the element ratings were aggregated into an overall risk potential.  Risk control measures were identified and their risk reduction potential was evaluated based on their effectiveness in reducing one or more qualitiatve risk potential ratings for the nine risk elements.